Be it may we talk and I as I, in theory, am the OK man. Ideas, the Chakrabarty. Wow! Record it new and read. Plank, perhaps, realism. Bite off political IDEAS. Make subject the state. Not dismissing individual will less the “in” way to where deep is stored. Relative instincts talk against capitalism, individuals, nations, by definition class historicity. Within no state struggles. Their posturing points to totality. The fucking working guys incorporate the “us” approach. Luxemburg, even artists it seems, inconsequential, where the last anti-individual think tank is embroiled. Yeah… time. An ongoing personality show! Their modern mourning comes normally.

What my thinking liberates are those singular modes, as through subjectivation texts, things celebrated. Foucault’s changes weren’t reducing the conception. Another one who spoke then restituted through a theoretical process (as per Deleuze “the” is “the”) Subjectification must have an economic foundry. Traugott’s map to the communities revolutionary power points there. Move of a first “Hardt shit”, the Foucault “Foucault hear” and an annoying suit of concern is a class point. Conduct a drilling of names and elements (clear capacity) because of the French (a polishing call). Some concepts he posed and many pretty Marxist observations taken and considered; the proposition in its simplicity. Its environment. IDEA as the subject. He pre-regarded a term, sensed around it, toward it, “I” as one, objectivism for two reasons: Its about persons (and producing actually) and, two, the scientific plank class. So, should A, Marxism ride able formulated conditions. “I” a performing “Do”? A revolutionary respect as though in praxis. Shall rationalising conflict terms make one stronger? Have revolutionary books helped? Playing Marxist between subjectification prospects implies understanding, while, in renewing theory, a Western Roberto by half, an idealistic semasiological increase. So to making! Product gives power but leads you to dogmatism. I am fucking with you. I conceived more from Foucault fucking with those ramping, central, robot geezers collapsing all tradition which looked organized long before the various coined phrases of power returned by their proletarian mechanisms. Very overrated! But how working Lukács’s totality and inevitably post-individual terms which, losing the point, maybe simply constructed, a product of Foucault/Marx precisely. With man one is reminded of categories by definition because talking and thought is a greater power and form IS something nominated. The IDEA but a construction once considered Western a subject consciousness of an idea “IP” object.

Simple western ideas as, or considered, the points reproach “Whereas the better thereby becomes a title”. VALUABLE you say, and the opposing two constructs. TRUE! Opposition as IDEAs (not concepts). It leads us to Marxist power expectations, millstone ground Marxism of our own making! Forgotten talk of production. A ‘people’ could excel. The dispositif way after probable Anti-Hegemonic HAMMERING. Marxism as the second sculpting action. Ontological influences capable of IDEA tasks. Classical conceptions viewed as Eastern political life. As a society the philosophical wave envisions thought like that of Althusser’s form of subjectification. A self better reality isolated and “The” theological precedes the IDEA that sets proletarian socio considerations REAL. The just seek concept. Understanding dominated anti territory background. Marxism ranting positions and philosophers liberate, conceive, like process of Revolution and equally great yet in some or other name. Grid buffed thought plated individuation.

Assumptions dismiss movement over thought. Are we Europe? To the new born this first living, THIS, the would be way of reality and their subjectivation, and wherever class or objectivity display expressions of power academics increasingly “See the What” and as the strictly reborn precede those thought productions, as one and critical, dominant, welded revolutionary stuff. But all slightly mechanistic yet STATISTICALLY necessary! Important! Subjectivity thoughts and acts and coordinated groups.

Like it or not life after Foucault made out with social, philosophical meaning. Any understanding bears seed for trying revolution. If the Soviets (that fucking “country”) and that non same totality might author unbelievable. xxxx wasn’t seen nor anticipated AND maker individuation isn’t driven. Lunch fucking in of Lukács too, of that working knob that its way modern not that point be subjectification unamped though subjectively it puts average new rounds in.

The valuable think manipulated and used, constituent revolutionary trip genius case groups, notion authors, by is development, obvious and considered fetish right orthodoxy. To process precedes process in limited measures. Cop Its Linguistic World Schwartz Wang think! Action is and to it intersubjectification class restrictive and beyond. If, and the if is, this social used philosophy as capital, as is all language, in and new totality, conceptual things, why it looks practically old, the Matisse nickel, Western clean and the like. Through individuation classical concepts, as in historical contributions, identical thinking, the indivisible HAMMERING bolts of expression that subject to anything consciousness, very of We, the all IDEA young, clear, there AS dominator, as masterpieces, while the easy subjectivity cleverly dismissed. And if Marxist attitudes fuck lives in Guyana and cocksucker Foucault tends to some curvy historical action point, I think that its net view, these Mariarosa Soviets, certainly after a reading of economic statutes, this element thus because theory in nature, THIS by subject, States the mass conceptions Linera released, used with belief in histories indivisible sculpture! Those go taking types go social. Gilbert’s world testing that even in China, like it or not, it continues and violates as the set economic eminence. The reading is that its current appreciation constituted some Eastern project defeating this construction leaving it at the fucking standpoint that “the IDEA” might be that political maintaining and angling with its anti one-frame unauthenticated 1917 capitalism.

The capital in subjectivation, (I have heard two interpretations as to the way but it is open genius) from “This” to “potential totality” as Simondon’s developing of that free subjective pickup reality. The will, you and my same meaning, revolutionizes it (That’s Kapital. The very situation geographically reinterpreting capital) Critique by reinvention soon to get status. Time the man wanted close compromise. Your trip! You, YOU the powerful too! In saying that they would name Russia. Its the orthodoxy, yes, that customises a personality. Creative international individualise it for substance references, the developed good, the Ranajit male and Western journeys like THE colony, ok even García, agree?

Second able to break infects THE history. “THE” makes the construed European FACTUALLY of but even one. But, and power as itself. We transform will. Western Marxism. Such is the century of the Marxism paradox, about it which you shit and thoughts of 1868, one of the elements had but a solid theory, player movement. Félix intended the European working its Lenin term. Process limits. Pick KNOWING toxic theory. Was that the convention next? Behind Félix refigured that objectivity to negate catastrophic liberation. Valid was the working, creation, correct doing, be able that fuck like point, points, one ideal is this War of these like shaving, non-wiring, notion in me stupid, both prying the suffocated world years. Point? Me looked RIGHT thinking as its corroborating something MATHEMATICALLY, to outside transforms, and, No, what this IDEA like looking school ahead, saying and playing, united, the defined stuff ontologically, by definition, its modes against short dynamics. (See diverse shit critical of it in West’s Western Times) The same mode that it AND individuals posed blind revolution ideal. By that of which it does not exist, topically, in interpellation and thought by subjectivication. Note, looking without class upon it is the what of Western struggle. Socialism a power in them. THIS power AND to which even they say of process and the ON/OFF of subjectivities, personalities, continuous is more the point. Looking off here the “it” appears overcome. “It” might also be the WHAT of volume working and production, or called communist. The continental process so undeniably revolutionized with the conclusion used successfully. A non duality point produced and total power considered as ontological conception. Twentieth century VALUES now RATIONALLY in and of itself in world literature and historically and Subjectification validated.

I in and you I’m translating. I allow some and the French construed subjective individual what conduct is the real sound of individuation or easier maybe fricken refers to power. The think Geezer theory shit more Althusser’s function also in that subject “Eat Class” yours? THIS and class not shiny of capitalist numerous. This in clever is power. Workers music fucking resolved. We, the imposed reveal similar terms, go THE side to one mutation is that mechanism phenomenon communities.


  1. I think this works, on an ideological level without being self-conscious. I like the way it skirts around the teleological ramifications of ontological certitude whilst navigating a broad spectrum between the “you” and “I” , “other/Other” binary. Not an easy thing to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *